According to psychological reactance theory, what might a person do to retaliate against a perceived loss of freedom?

Psychological reactance theory posits that individuals have a natural tendency to perceive restrictions on their freedoms as a threat, leading them to react against those perceived limitations. When someone feels their freedom is compromised or threatened, they often take actions to restore that sense of autonomy.

Choosing to assert their original behavior more strongly aligns perfectly with this theory. It reflects a common reaction where individuals push back against imposed restrictions by doubling down on their previously held behaviors or beliefs. This act of asserting oneself is a way to reclaim their freedom and resist influence from external forces that they believe are infringing upon their autonomy.

In contrast, the other options suggest alternative responses. Engaging more deeply in new experiences and re-evaluating life choices might represent a more adaptive or reflective response to changes, but they do not directly illustrate the impulse to resist perceived restrictions. Reinforcing a connection with an authority figure might be seen as submitting to influence rather than asserting one's own behaviors, which does not resonate with the concept of reactance. Thus, the choice to assert original behavior serves as a direct manifestation of reactance to perceived restrictions.